![]() However, for both programs, the real competition is the proprietary scan utilities and drivers that manufacturers supply with their scanners for no extra cost. SilverFast's main competitor is the VueScan 9 Professional Edition, another utility with lots of sophisticated features and the ability to work with any number of scanners. SilverFast lets you wring the best possible photo scan quality out of whatever photo scanner you use it with. The good part is that it's among the best known, most widely used, and most capable programs in its category for a good reason: Once you learn how to use it, it will give you excellent results. ![]() The bad part is that although it's not hard to muddle through with SilverFast without knowing how to use it well, it's hard to master. I mean that in both a good and a bad way. In many ways, LaserSoft Imaging's SilverFast Ai Studio 8 ($299 to $449, depending on the scanner model) is the Photoshop of scan utilities. ![]() Needs a separate version for each scanner model it supports.How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac.How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.It's then up to you to learn the software and how to apply it. If the neg is not so good, then the scanner can't do any better than that. If the neg is top notch, even Vuescan will produce a very good scan from it. For a start, the scanner is only as good as the negative being scanned. ![]() If other folk post pics that are sharper and have better color than your pics, they either have better equipment and/or better knowledge of the software they're using, or you are simply not post processing your pics to their standard. There's usually good reports about the Canon 9000f (I take it you meant "9000" not "900"), but determine if that is the scanner you want to continue with before buying Silverfast which will be locked into your scanner, and then have to change it for any future scanner you acquire. But now you say you want to print 13x19, well that's a different matter altogether, Silverfast would be worthwhile in that case, but there's still a learning curve with it and also with Vuescan. I'm basically self and youtube taught, but if there's a good learning solution, or a needed equipment upgrade, I'm all for any ideas anyone has.Ĭlick to expand.No, Silverfast has a reasonable reputationīut for posting pics online, it's not really necessary to buy Silverfast which is a major cost. I've learned a lot over the past couple of years, but I feel I've hit a roadblock in terms of learning curve. Would pricier consumer-grade scanner really make that much of a difference? Or is it possible my Lightroom/Photoshop skills are that below par? Is there a scanner below the V800 price range that would be worth upgrading to? Or is the general consensus that Flatbeds are no longer the way to go? I am constantly on Instagram and various online publications and see other 35mm images with sharpness and color ranges much better and deeper than I've ever achieved. I think now that I'm doing mostly color 35mm film instead of black and white, Epson would have been the better brand choice. Maybe it couldn't hurt to have both? VueScan definitely has a lot of strengths, and I've gotten lots of nice images out of it, its just not consistent especially with color accuracy and range.Īs for my scanner, I'm reasonably happy with the resolution of many of my scans, but reading online there's a lot of debate over the actual resolution of these scanners. The time spent getting a decent looking image from which I can more easily pick my best frames and do any detail editing is a fraction of the time. I'm well aware of the cost of Silverfast vs Vuescan, as well as the company's reputation as not so consumer friendly (charging for upgrades and registering for new scanners) but I'm still thinking about making the switch. VueScan also constantly clips the blacks, and I find the interface so spartan I don't feel I have much control over what I'm doing. Either way the amount of post just to get the image to a basically satisfactory level is crazy time consuming. VueScan rarely hits the color even nearly correct, and I've resorted to either scanning the negatives in raw and manually turning each image into a positive then color correcting in Photoshop, or, if the color is at least in the ballpark for a roll, flattening the image out as much as possible in VueScan. I've been using a Canon 900f MKII with VueScan Pro for a while now, and while I've been reasonably happy with the results I recently tried a trial version of Silverfast SE 8 and was amazed at the differences right out of the scanner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |